[135601] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: PPPOE vs DHCP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bulk)
Thu Jan 27 02:04:35 2011
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: "'Jack Bates'" <jbates@brightok.net>,
<nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D406223.4010104@brightok.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:04:29 -0600
Reply-To: frnkblk@iname.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
If Cisco won't do a good job of RBE on the 7206VXR, I may just need to =
stick with PPPoEv6 on the SR train. I have that successfully working in =
a test bed.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jbates@brightok.net]=20
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:04 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: PPPOE vs DHCP
On 1/26/2011 11:03 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
> So they're telling us, at least for PPPoE specifically. Cisco =
solution is "buy ASR".
>
This is same solution they've given for the 7206 and other traditional=20
IOS platforms. I haven't checked, but all the RBE/unnumbered vlan=20
support for IPv6 with proxy-ND, better radius backend for DHCPv6, and=20
supposedly IA_TA support for DHCPv6 will be in the ASR only. The=20
features in IOS SR train are somewhat functional but extremely limited.
If I find myself having to spend money on ASRs, I may just spend the=20
money replacing them with Juniper. Only reason I haven't is that I=20
haven't needed to spend the money at all.
Jack
