|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1101261257290.211@cust11794.lava.net> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:45:41 -0800 To: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Jan 26, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Owen DeLong wrote: >=20 >> It would be nice if BSD would correct their IPV6_V6ONLY behavior = instead >> of putting up an alleged security red herring. I'm not sure why = Micr0$0ft suffers >> from this braindeath. >=20 > Or at the very least document this in plain site in the IPv6 section = of the docs. Their non-RFC-compliant behaviour is a hidden land mine. >=20 > Antonio Querubin > e-mail/xmpp: tony@lava.net It's actually pretty well known and it is documented in several places = in plain sight. They're quite proud of their brokenness and they extol the virtues of = the allegedly improved security profile it provides. I think Rolland Dobbins has coined a good term for it... "Security = Theater". (Though this strikes me as being more like "Security Circus") Owen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |