[135537] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Wed Jan 26 12:05:29 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinkMg+n6z8nZbxBD+9uRe5BBc2c+ceExbNQgqFp@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:01:40 -0800
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I haven't done exhaustive testing, but, it has to do with certain =
combinations
of IPv4 configurations and IPv6 routing do work and other combinations
don't.
Owen
On Jan 26, 2011, at 4:41 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> Could you elaborate? Which circumstances?
>=20
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>> It works for routing native IPv6 under some circumstances as well.
>>=20
>> Owen
>>=20
>> On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does =
PPPOE
>>>>=20
>>>> The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a =
basic IPv6 firewall.
>>>=20
>>> Yes it is. I already reported to Marco.
>>> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/content-ipv6-cpe-survey
>>>=20
>>> It should be included somehow in a matrix But 6to4 (or other =
tunneling techniques) is only a substitute of real IPv6.
>>>=20
>>> Regards,
>>> Janos Mohacsi
>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Mirjam Kuehne" <mir@ripe.net>
>>>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
>>>> Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input =
Needed
>>>>=20
>>>> [apologies for duplicates]
>>>>=20
>>>> Hello,
>>>>=20
>>>> Based on new information we received since the last publication, we
>>>> updated the IPv6 CPE matrix:
>>>>=20
>>>> =
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
>>>>=20
>>>> In order to make this information more useful for a large user =
base, we
>>>> are preparing a detailed survey to gather more structural feedback =
about
>>>> the range of equipment that is currently in use. Not only would we =
like
>>>> you to participate in this survey, but we also ask for your help in
>>>> identifying the right survey questions. Please find a call for =
input on
>>>> RIPE Labs:
>>>>=20
>>>> =
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/future-of-the-ipv6-cpe-survey-more-inpu=
t-needed
>>>>=20
>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>> Mirjam Kuehne & Marco Hogewoning
>>>> RIPE NCC
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
