[135519] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marco Hogewoning)
Wed Jan 26 04:23:08 2011

From: Marco Hogewoning <mch-nanog@xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101260856400.69156@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:22:50 +0000
To: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Hi,

Maybe a bit more to explain. Up to now I asked the vendors to provide =
certain information before adding a box to the matrix. Apple was send a =
copy but they never responded. In future we are going to build the =
matrix upon user supplied data. See the article on the future of this =
work at =
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/future-of-the-ipv6-cpe-survey-more-inpu=
t-needed.

What we'll probably do is include everything for which there is a =
minimum number of responses like 5 or 10. Actual number to be decided =
upon once this is rolling and we can figure out the relevant number is.

Grtx,

Marco

On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:

>=20
>=20
>=20
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
>=20
>> What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
>>=20
>> The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a =
basic IPv6 firewall.
>=20
> Yes it is. I already reported to Marco.
> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/content-ipv6-cpe-survey
>=20
> It should be included somehow in a matrix But 6to4 (or other tunneling =
techniques) is only a substitute of real IPv6.
>=20
> Regards,
> 	Janos Mohacsi
>=20
>>=20
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mirjam Kuehne" <mir@ripe.net>
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
>> Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input =
Needed
>>=20
>> [apologies for duplicates]
>>=20
>> Hello,
>>=20
>> Based on new information we received since the last publication, we
>> updated the IPv6 CPE matrix:
>>=20
>> =
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
>>=20
>> In order to make this information more useful for a large user base, =
we
>> are preparing a detailed survey to gather more structural feedback =
about
>> the range of equipment that is currently in use. Not only would we =
like
>> you to participate in this survey, but we also ask for your help in
>> identifying the right survey questions. Please find a call for input =
on
>> RIPE Labs:
>>=20
>> =
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/future-of-the-ipv6-cpe-survey-more-inpu=
t-needed
>>=20
>> Kind Regards,
>> Mirjam Kuehne & Marco Hogewoning
>> RIPE NCC
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>=20



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post