[135503] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roland Dobbins)
Wed Jan 26 00:52:04 2011
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110126160355.3847cba5@opy.nosense.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:49:13 +0700
To: nanog group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> The correct assumption is that most people will try and usually =
succeed at follow the specifications, as that is what is required to
> successfully participate in a protocol (any protocol, not just =
networking ones). IPv4 history has shown that most people will.
Specification <> application, as in new applications.
And, no, I don't think that 'most people will' - I've seen enough =
foolishness with regards to IPv4 misaddressing over the last =
quarter-century (pre- and post-CIDR) to share your optimism in that =
regard.
;>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid, with millions
of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but
just done by brute force and thousands of slaves.
-- Alan Kay
