[135399] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Mon Jan 24 20:34:32 2011
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:32:47 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Crist Clark" <Crist.Clark@globalstar.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D3DA762.33E4.0097.1@globalstar.com>
Cc: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p/
> All of the (mostly religious) arguments about /64 versus any
> smaller subnets aside, I'm curious about why one would choose
> /126 over /127 for P-to-P links?
see above
randy
