[135366] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Mon Jan 24 08:28:47 2011
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:28:25 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: carlos@lacnic.net
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=sh+gPPHoNKwME2u5zMpaS9uO20gUfZKoaSx9d@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
as a test case, i built a small home network out of /120. works just fine.
my home network has been native IPv6 for about 5 years now, using a /96 and IVI.
some thoughts. disable RD/RA/ND.
none of the DHCPv6 code works like DHCP, so I re-wrote
client and server code so that it does.
static address assignment is a good thing for services like DNS/HTTP
secure dynmaic update is your friend
summary - its not easy, vendors don't want to help. but it can be done.
--bill
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:59:59AM -0200, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
> The subject says it all... anyone with experience with a setup like this ?
>
> I am particularly wondering about possible NDP breakage.
>
> cheers!
>
> Carlos
>
> --
> --
> =========================
> Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo
> http://www.labs.lacnic.net
> =========================
