[135263] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jarod smith)
Wed Jan 19 07:04:03 2011
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik1twjfBnhcyLYvx+RBHs63hi2siCE6R9SLMgfv@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:02:33 +0100
From: jarod smith <jarod.smouth@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thanks for your reply.
In summary it's not possible to deployed IPv6 only if I want to access the
whole internet :)
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:18 AM, jarod smith <jarod.smouth@gmail.com>wrote:
> Although it would seem that double-stack is still the preferred method of linux
> distribution, I want my next deployed in IPv6 only.
> For linux there is NAT-PT tomicki and NAT64 Viagenie.
>
> I don't have Cisco equipment although I'd like tested their NAT-PT, even
> if it's obsolete.
>
> Are some of you have installed one of these two implementations in
> production on recent versions of linux? Is it stable, secure, ... ?
>
>
> Regards
>
