|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:05:28 -0800 In-Reply-To: <BLU158-w48D8FEABCAD84C7FE4896ADCF70@phx.gbl> From: "George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com> To: "Brandon Kim" <brandon.kim@brandontek.com>, <jbates@brightok.net>, <bill@herrin.us> Cc: ayousuf0079@gmail.com, nanog group <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Brandon Kim=20 > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:57 AM > To: jbates@brightok.net; bill@herrin.us > Cc: ayousuf0079@gmail.com; nanog group > Subject: RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover >=20 >=20 > Someone should advise him that if he wants to take in a full BGP > routing table > that he makes sure his router can handle it! I would hate for him to > open the floodgates > and his production router shuts down. LOL.... One can take a full feed but filter so only a subset of the routes are actually installed. For example, filter all routes that are more than one AS away from the immediate upstream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |