[135176] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Request Spamhaus contact
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Wall)
Mon Jan 17 22:00:57 2011
In-Reply-To: <20110117193604.3d86ee37@petrie.gateway.2wire.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:32:03 -0500
From: Mark Wall <ospfisisis@gmail.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:36 PM, William Pitcock
<nenolod@systeminplace.net>wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:28:55 -0500
> Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net> wrote:
>
> > Rhetorical question. Probably PCCW isn't accepting the null routes.
> > Why not blacklist them for having messed up communities?
>
> Why not actually nullroute the IPs instead of depending on BGP tagging?
> Again: "ip route 208.64.120.197 255.255.255.255 Null0"
>
> William
>
>
I prefer ip route 208.64.120.197 255.255.255.255 Null0 tag <nullroute
community>
Serves both purposes well
