[135135] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Request Spamhaus contact
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Kirch)
Mon Jan 17 20:18:50 2011
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:51:23 -0500
From: Andrew Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimUaF-5jfsgMT7DegcCeo9=wnpTnE7ipmC1UkPW@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I've got no experience running a DNSBL, nor does William, but it seems
to me that I'm not getting told the truth. Now, as I said, I don't
always agree with Spamhaus' policies, but I'd bet a ham sandwich that
you don't get delisted any time soon.
Andrew
> William,
>
> It depends, we have criteria. You can't just e-mail
> abuse@blacklotus.net and expect any given web site to be immediately
> shut down. There is due process and we need to make a decision on the
> matter and serve it to our customer. If a customer is listed at
> Spamhaus this is sufficient.
>
> Being a legitimate corporation means that we're accountable for
> maintaining certain standards. Everyone assumes that because we
> mitigate DDoS that we're no better than some offshore spam haven.
>
> Jeff
>
> BTW: IP space is still null routed, still waiting on Spamhaus to stop
> nailing innocent customers.
>
>
