[135069] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Gettys)
Sun Jan 16 09:25:04 2011
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:23:57 -0500
From: Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>
To: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110116183016.022b2542@opy.nosense.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 01/16/2011 03:00 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
>> Can we *please* stop this pointless thread?
>>
>
> I don't think it pointless to network operators - NAT or not has
> operational impacts on troubleshooting, network design, addressing plans
> etc. I understand you aren't a network operator, so if you're not
> interested perhaps you should unsubscribe.
>
I'm sorry; it is the piece of the thread about whether network operators
are going to hand out only single IP addresses in IPv6 that had got my
goat. I should have made that clear.
- Jim
