[135054] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Ross)
Sat Jan 15 18:24:55 2011
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:24:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Brandon Ross <bross@pobox.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <431CD585-5A99-4AB6-AC35-D2E080DAB578@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I really doubt this will be the case in IPv6.
I really hope you are right, because I don't want to see that either,
however...
Why do you suppose they did that before with IPv4? Sure you can make the
argument NOW that v4 is in scarce supply, but 10 years ago it was still
the case.
Has Comcast actually come out and committed to allowing me to have as my
IPs as I want on a consumer connection in the most basic, cheapest
package? Has any other major provider?
--
Brandon Ross AIM: BrandonNRoss
ICQ: 2269442
Skype: brandonross Yahoo: BrandonNRoss
