[135034] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Routing Suggestions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Silvester)
Fri Jan 14 18:23:07 2011
In-Reply-To: <m239ov95lb.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 09:52:59 +1030
From: Sam Silvester <sam.silvester@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> i'm with jon and the static crew. =A0brutal but simple.
Depending on how the interconnect is built, using the "permanent"
keyword along with the static route may be worth investigating also if
you want the static route to stay in place, if you wish to prevent the
static being withdrawn if the interface goes down.
Sam
