[135017] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco Sanitization
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason LeBlanc)
Fri Jan 14 10:11:02 2011
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:10:51 -0500
From: Jason LeBlanc <jml@packetpimp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1294863447.2798.66.camel@home>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I was fired from eBay several years ago for posting to NANOG trying to
help others deal with the dDoS issues of those days, nothing said was
fair for termination IMO. Using a personal account may be prudent. Now
I hardly ever even post.
On 01/12/2011 03:17 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
> Le mercredi 12 janvier 2011 à 11:41 -0800, JC Dill a écrit :
> <snip/>
>> Randy,
>>
>> If you want to cite list policy, let's start by noting that it's a clear
>> violation of the nanog list AUP to setup an autoresponder reply to list
>> email[1], no matter if the autoresponder replies to the list or just to
>> the poster. You must whitelist email from the list before applying an
>> autoresponder. If you don't want to see the disclaimer-laden emails,
>> then you can whitelist, then send posts with disclaimers (along with all
>> other posts you don't care to read) to dev/null.
>>
>> OTOH, there is nothing in the AUP about disclaimers. Disclaimers, top
>> posting, excessive quoting, etc. are discouraged (considered poor
>> netiquette) but not outright forbidden.
> Either way, a 15-50 or more lines legal notification style appendix to
> a mail in an informal operation's forum... ... seems at the very best...
> to be of... bad taste... (to me). (Who's reading these? :))
>
> Cheers,
>
> mh
> <snip/>
>
>
>
