[134993] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (b nickell)
Thu Jan 13 17:13:45 2011
In-Reply-To: <16E58A1FE7C64A46BAD0FE1558C43D9201363D2A@es1.ic-sa.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:13:38 -0700
From: b nickell <nickellman@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ruiz <mruiz@lstfinancial.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Cheers.. to M.A.R.'s related view
On Jan 13, 2011 12:37 PM, "Michael Ruiz" <mruiz@lstfinancial.com> wrote:
I know where I have worked we have had a mixture of Juniper and Cisco
equipment. Personally buying a Juniper Router like a M or a T series is
like buying a Ferrari. I like Cisco personally and they are cheaper than
buying a Juniper. For example a M-series is always going to cost some
bucks after you factor the FPC and the PICS that need to be loaded.
Personally I like the JUNOS system better than the Cisco IOS, it is more
tech friendly when troubleshooting issues. I have not worked on the new
IOS-NX system, but if I understand it correctly it is modular. If Cisco
can the really cool Monitor command and the structure the command tree
like a Juniper. I would think Cisco did something totally right.
M.A.R
