[134989] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Thu Jan 13 16:04:34 2011
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:03:50 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <53B1C18E-BC4A-4520-9C3C-3CEC45286C00@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, Michael Ruiz <mruiz@lstfinancial.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/13/2011 2:58 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> reload in 5
>> make changes
>> verify things are working
>> reload cancel
>>
>> It's a little different on a redundant processor system, as you have to reload both processors. It's also a 2-20 minute outage while you reload, but it does beat 2 hour drives.
>
> Not at all the same... With JunOS, I can have the changes I made running for days, but, when some problem is later discovered I can still rollback to the previous (or several revisions back). I can easily compare the current config to several previous revisions, etc.
>
EDIT: </sarcasm>
