[134983] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Whynott)
Thu Jan 13 15:13:55 2011

From: Greg Whynott <Greg.Whynott@oicr.on.ca>
To: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:13:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20110113194012.GD19019@hiwaay.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

at one shop were i considered using Juniper instead of a Cisco internet edg=
e router,  the cost of the Juniper was so close to the Cisco it was a non c=
onsideration.    The only reason we went with Cisco that time was due to th=
e fact most of the other gear was Cisco,  and it seemed to make more sense =
to stay with cisco instead of introducing a new vendor/methods into the mix=
 without good reason.

The hardware alone was cheaper than the Cisco kit,  but after we said we ne=
eded to hold a million BGP routes,  the prices became very similar.  Junipe=
r wants to license you on the amount of routes you intend to receive,  if i=
 remember correctly.

-g





On Jan 13, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Chris Adams wrote:

> Once upon a time, Michael Ruiz <mruiz@lstfinancial.com> said:
>> I like Cisco personally and they are cheaper than
>> buying a Juniper.  For example a M-series is always going to cost some
>> bucks after you factor the FPC and the PICS that need to be loaded.
>
> We didn't find that to be the case, after you factor in all the Cisco
> pieces that need to be loaded as well.  Both make modular routers, so I
> don't see how saying that one requires modules is a valid argument.
>
> --
> Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
> I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
>


--

This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged=
 information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or dist=
ribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intende=
d is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, pleas=
e contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other =
information contained in this message may not be that of the organization.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post