[134919] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: co-location and access to your server
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen van Aart)
Wed Jan 12 19:31:01 2011
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:28:56 -0800
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE0BC1332C@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com>
X-Assp-Envelope-From: jeroen@mompl.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
George Bonser wrote:
> Awesome. It's good to know that there are still operations like that around. That is probably found more often in local providers and not so often in the big operations. The more community oriented providers would be much more accepting of such a situation than a large operation.
Community oriented provider, that's what I am talking about. I just
couldn't find the right term.
> but having someone "on call" probably isn't that bad if it is infrequently needed.
I'd be willing to pay extra for access after hours, either a recurring
fee or on a case by case basis. I am not searching for the cheapest
option and demanding that in addition my car be detailed weekly. But
just some co-locating space for one or a few servers where I don't have
to plan a week ahead or miss half a day of $dayjob in order to work on
it (which would cost me more).
Greetings,
Jeroen
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
