[13463] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv8 < IPv6

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alan Hannan)
Thu Nov 6 14:33:14 1997

Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 14:19:57 -0500
From: Alan Hannan <hannan@bythetrees.com>
To: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
Cc: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <19971106111905.28971@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>; from Jay R. Ashworth on Thu, Nov 06, 1997 at 11:19:05AM -0500


  Jay R. Ashworth demanded:
> And, as I noted in a private reply: justify that statement.

  Physical topology is likely to map to geographic topology.
  Circuits certainly do take odd L1 paths to connect L1 endpoints,
  but these are exceptions, not he rule.

  Accordingly, not allocating in a geographic fashion lends to
  deaggregation, which is bad.

  Even me, as a proponent of fully meshed architectures, recognizes
  that hierarchy is demanded, and will give rise to efficient
  network announcments if properly utilized.

  -alan


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post