[134622] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: FAA - ASDI servers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ryan Finnesey)
Fri Jan 7 22:11:28 2011
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 19:11:21 -0800
In-Reply-To: <C1F3734F-073D-4729-84D8-F55C3B11181E@doubleshotsecurity.com>
From: "Ryan Finnesey" <ryan.finnesey@HarrierInvestments.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I wanted to thank everyone for both their online and offline replies.
At this time the FAA does not support IPv6 to connect to the ASDI
servers.
Cheers
Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Merike Kaeo [mailto:merike@doubleshotsecurity.com]=20
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 12:14 AM
To: Ryan Finnesey
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: FAA - ASDI servers=20
I've pinged someone offline who may have a contact. Will let you know
offline if I do and connect you. I had some peripheral insight a few
years ago when I did some work with Boeing. Even had a hand at editing
some ARINC standards. The airline industry was umm....interesting :)
Suffice to say the guy I was working with at Boeing was pushing hard for
v6 capability within ARINC and this was 2007. Keep fingers crossed.
- merike
On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:57 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> Can they simply extend the mandate? We need to setup new
connectivity
> to the FFA and was hoping to go IPv6 right out of the gate.
> Cheers
> Ryan
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Oberman [mailto:oberman@es.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:12 PM
> To: Christopher Morrow
> Cc: Ryan Finnesey; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: FAA - ASDI servers
>=20
>> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:49:34 -0500
>> From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
>>=20
>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Ryan Finnesey=20
>> <ryan.finnesey@harrierinvestments.com> wrote:
>>> Very true but why the reference to vacuum tubes?
>>=20
>> sadly it was an FAA computer system joke.
>=20
> But, since the "F" stands for Federal, if it is still up in two years,
> it must be reachable by IPv6. Today, the odds are pretty slim as=20
> almost no federal systems are reachable by IPv6. It will be an=20
> interesting two years for a lot of federal IT folks as the mandate is=20
> from the OMB who can pull a budget for non-compliance.
> --
> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
> E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
> Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
>=20
