[134591] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NIST IPv6 document
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin M. Streiner)
Fri Jan 7 14:09:55 2011
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 10:12:04 -0500 (EST)
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=qenyuxaGnzM71Wj1DHSTqy6dmRXaTW8cbyjFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
---1463794431-1226824780-1294413124=:31363
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>> 1. =A0 =A0 =A0Block packets destined for your point-to-point links at yo=
ur
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0borders. There's no legitimate reason someone should be
>
> Most networks do not do this today. Whether or not that is wise is
> questionable, but I don't think those networks want NDP to be the
> reason they choose to make this change.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't blocking all traffic destined for=20
your infrastructure at the borders also play havoc with PTMUD? Limiting=20
the traffic allowed to just the necessary types would seem like a=20
reasonable alternative.
jms
---1463794431-1226824780-1294413124=:31363--
