[134569] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NIST IPv6 document
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Fri Jan 7 04:39:43 2011
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: Nanog Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 09:38:32 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20110107194452.110fa401@opy.nosense.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jan 7, 2011, at 4:14 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> Doesn't this risk already exist in IPv4?=20
There are various vendor knobs/features to ameliorate ARP-level issues in s=
witching gear. Those same knobs aren't viable in IPv6 due to the way ND/NS=
work, and as you mention, the ND stuff is layer-3-routable.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid, with millions
of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but
just done by brute force and thousands of slaves.
-- Alan Kay
