[134448] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Problems with removing NAT from a network
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Thu Jan 6 00:56:51 2011
To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:39:30 -0800."
<AANLkTikS_EnACm2BfYx=B=M=khejAqJKvdbwX2hwmqHh@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:55:59 +1100
Cc: Nanog Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <AANLkTikS_EnACm2BfYx=B=M=khejAqJKvdbwX2hwmqHh@mail.gmail.com>, Came
ron Byrne writes:
> As long as dual-stack is around, the app vendors don't have to move
> and network guys have to dream up hacks to support these legacy apps
> (CGN ....).
NAT64 is CGN expecially when it is being implemented by the cellular
carriers.
> Cameron
>
> >
> > Matthew Kaufman
> >
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
