[134394] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NIST IPv6 document
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Wed Jan 5 13:23:58 2011
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 10:23:28 -0800
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinVKNQ+TZUt1XvXt97S_RQMmrpWhXy7gT4fbJUr@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/5/2011 10:02, TJ wrote:
>
> Many would argue that the version of IP is irrelevant, if you are permitting
> external hosts the ability to scan your internal network in an unrestricted
> fashion (no stateful filtering or rate limiting) you have already lost, you
> just might not know it yet.
>
Stateful filtering introduces its own set of scaling issues.
~Seth
