[134343] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FAA - ASDI servers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael DeMan)
Wed Jan 5 00:02:04 2011
From: Michael DeMan <nanog@deman.com>
In-Reply-To: <6EFFEFBAC68377459A2E972105C759EC0342B558@EXVBE005-2.exch005intermedia.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:01:59 -0800
To: NANOG Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Cc: Ryan Finnesey <ryan.finnesey@HarrierInvestments.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Is that the FFA or the FAA?
On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:57 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> Can they simply extend the mandate? We need to setup new connectivity
> to the FFA and was hoping to go IPv6 right out of the gate.
> Cheers
> Ryan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Oberman [mailto:oberman@es.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:12 PM
> To: Christopher Morrow
> Cc: Ryan Finnesey; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: FAA - ASDI servers
>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:49:34 -0500
>> From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Ryan Finnesey
>> <ryan.finnesey@harrierinvestments.com> wrote:
>>> Very true but why the reference to vacuum tubes?
>>
>> sadly it was an FAA computer system joke.
>
> But, since the "F" stands for Federal, if it is still up in two years,
> it must be reachable by IPv6. Today, the odds are pretty slim as almost
> no federal systems are reachable by IPv6. It will be an interesting two
> years for a lot of federal IT folks as the mandate is from the OMB who
> can pull a budget for non-compliance.
> --
> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
> E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
> Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
>
