[134219] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Smith)
Wed Dec 29 11:26:04 2010
In-Reply-To: <4D1B5405.20701@bryanfields.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:24:15 -0500
From: Josh Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net> wrot=
e:
> On 12/29/2010 08:19, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>>
>> Most of these regulations are centered on the concern that your
>> building not look like a tower site. =C2=A0An antenna that is sufficient=
ly
>> small that it can not be seen from the ground without resorting to
>> optics may be on their "oh, that's fine" list once they see one
>> sitting on the table in front of them.
>
> Don't forget about OTARD, where so long as you control the space in your
> lease, no local government regulations can prevent installation of a inte=
rnet
> reception radio.
>
> Also, the Ubiquiti is crap from a build/reliability standpoint. =C2=A0If =
you're
> doing anything serious, it would be worth it to buy a better product. =C2=
=A0I'm
> partial to the Alvarion and Motorola PtP links.
>
>
> --
> Bryan Fields
>
> 727-409-1194 - Voice
> 727-214-2508 - Fax
> http://bryanfields.net
>
>
While certainly not the best stuff made I've found the ubiquiti
equipment to be very nice for the price and have a few of their AP's
which have been in service 24x7 for a couple of years now.
Thanks,
-- Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber:=C2=A0 juicewvu@gmail.com
phone:=C2=A0 304.237.9369(c)
