[134207] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert E. Seastrom)
Wed Dec 29 08:02:25 2010
To: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@seastrom.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 08:00:43 -0500
In-Reply-To: <13710334.3140.1293593268622.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
(Jay Ashworth's message of "Tue,
28 Dec 2010 22:27:48 -0500 (EST)")
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Doug Barton" <dougb@dougbarton.us>
>
>> Now OTOH if someone wants to demonstrate the value in having a
>> publication channel for TLD DNSKEYs outside of the root zone, I'm
>> certainly willing to listen. Just be forewarned that you will have an
>> uphill battle in trying to prove your case. :)
>
> If you do not, then your clients have little hope of spotting insider
> malfeasance changes, no?
>
> Or aren't such changes practical for other reasons which I don't
> understand, not being a DNSSEC maven?
Can you provide us a scenario?
-r
