[134181] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Wireless IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Tue Dec 28 14:06:05 2010
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:04:40 -0800
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTini86Z9FHfipJHXwYG8L79XFSQhqRHTLFKXRTSz@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 12/28/10 10:35 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> FWIW, the same does not appear to be true of the Verizon 3G network. (Not
> that anyone expected it to be.) My VZW device has a NATted v4 address and
> only link-local v6.
lack of a chipset support is a notable problem there....
joel
> On Dec 28, 2010 1:26 PM, "Cameron Byrne" <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:15 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:49:37 E...
> Just to update the group, a helpful person sent me a screenshot of the
> VZW LTE connection manager, and it does indeed have a public IPv6
> address an a 10.x.x.x IPv4 address. So, true to claim, the new LTE
> service available today on USB sticks is production dual-stack.
> Bravo!
>
> Cameron
> ======
> http://groups.google.com/group/tmoipv6beta
> ======
>
