[134125] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Router only speaks IGP in BGP network
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Sat Dec 25 03:38:24 2010
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka@globaltransit.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 16:36:31 +0800
In-Reply-To: <m2fwto840c.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: afnog@afnog.org
Reply-To: mtinka@globaltransit.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart2260444.Y4Ttq1Z1WJ
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Friday, December 24, 2010 07:26:43 am Randy Bush wrote:
> and do NOT redistribute bgp into ospf.
This is good truth. Don't redistribute your BGP into the IGP=20
(or vice versa). I'm not even sure OSPF would handle it in=20
this day - but you don't want to find out.
Mark.
--nextPart2260444.Y4Ttq1Z1WJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)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=s7t4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2260444.Y4Ttq1Z1WJ--
