[133818] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Benson Schliesser)
Fri Dec 17 13:11:12 2010
From: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimV321G8zA44OYzY1p1O2cAEm6Vh7rraEUt9R=Y@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:11:26 -0600
To: Jeff Wheeler <jsw@inconcepts.biz>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Dec 17, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> ... Level3 must think that their business
> would be better off with regulatory oversight of peering, or they
> would not have taken this action.=20
And they might be correct in thinking that, if we assume the peering =
ecosystem is changing i.e. such that traditional "backbones" are being =
bypassed. Regulatory oversight might have the effect of locking-in =
today's interconnect regime, which would be ideal for Level(3).
Cheers,
-Benson
