[133707] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Dec 16 08:48:06 2010
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:05:26 CST."
<4D0965D6.3090907@brightok.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:47:15 -0500
Cc: Adam Rothschild <asr+nanog@latency.net>, Kevin Neal <kevin@safelink.net>,
nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1292507235_5175P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:05:26 CST, Jack Bates said:
> request financing? ie, Comcast could run lower rates and offer better
> service by charging the content provider, while competitive eyeball
> networks won't get the option to receive compensation from content
> providers and have to charge appropriate rates to their customers.
Yes, Comcast *could* do that. But let's stick to plausible scenarios, OK?
--==_Exmh_1292507235_5175P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFNChhjcC3lWbTT17ARAjjcAJ9bZlUaPJyGrS0ZKgjNEm5qBcxyeQCfTFVz
rICDUNtf0s3M38ST4gnWTXo=
=0xiv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1292507235_5175P--
