[133688] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Wed Dec 15 20:05:41 2010
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:05:26 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: Adam Rothschild <asr+nanog@latency.net>
In-Reply-To: <20101215224708.GB82574@latency.net>
Cc: Kevin Neal <kevin@safelink.net>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 12/15/2010 4:47 PM, Adam Rothschild wrote:
> Folk in
> content/hosting should find this all more than a little bit scary.
So you don't think the money content providers will pay Comcast won't
reflect on other eyeball networks who aren't important/large enough to
request financing? ie, Comcast could run lower rates and offer better
service by charging the content provider, while competitive eyeball
networks won't get the option to receive compensation from content
providers and have to charge appropriate rates to their customers.
Jack
