[133664] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeffrey Lyon)
Wed Dec 15 14:13:47 2010

In-Reply-To: <C92E5BE7.1DAC3%lists@mtin.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:13:37 -0500
From: Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net>
To: Justin Wilson <lists@mtin.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

They can't be paying more than a couple of dollars per Mbps.

Jeff


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Justin Wilson <lists@mtin.net> wrote:
> =A0 =A0Ay 10 Gig levels bandwidth should be much much cheaper than $30 /M=
bit.
> --
> Justin Wilson <j2sw@mtin.net>
> Aol & Yahoo IM: j2sw
> http://www.mtin.net/blog =AD xISP News
> http://www.twitter.com/j2sw =AD Follow me on Twitter
> Wisp Consulting =AD Tower Climbing =AD Network Support
>
>
>
>
> From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org>
> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:46:13 -0500 (EST)
> To: <nanog@nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style
>
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>
>> If a 10G port for transit is paid by comcast $30/Mbit/s monthly
>> that's 0.19 cent/internet customer/month for a new 10G port
>> to properly desaturate this particular link.
>>
>> Did I compute something wrong?
>
> At that bandwidth level, isn't $30/mbit roughly an order of magnitude
> higher than people are actually paying?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> =A0Jon Lewis, MCP :) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 | =A0I route
> =A0Senior Network Engineer =A0 =A0 | =A0therefore you are
> =A0Atlantic Net =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|
> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
>
>
>



--=20
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post