[133661] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bryan Irvine)
Wed Dec 15 13:25:56 2010
In-Reply-To: <201012151320550382.0090FCD7@sentry.24cl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:25:53 -0800
From: Bryan Irvine <sparctacus@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Mike. <the.lists@mgm51.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/15/2010 at 9:17 AM Ben wrote:
>
> |On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Stefan Fouant <
> |sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net> wrote:
> |
> |> > -----Original Message-----
> |> > From: mikea [mailto:mikea@mikea.ath.cx]
> |> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:28 AM
> |> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> |> > Subject: Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation.
> [snip]
> =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
>
> Another relevant comment from the OpenBSD tech mailing list:
>
>
> http://www.marc.info/?l=3Dopenbsd-tech&m=3D129237675106730&w=3D2
Also, the original sender of the email confirms he sent it. Also
mentions PF as a target in the follow-up.
http://blogs.csoonline.com/1296/an_fbi_backdoor_in_openbsd
Anyone know the trustworthy-ness of 'csoonline'?
-Bryan
