[133654] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin Wilson)
Wed Dec 15 11:50:04 2010

Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:49:59 -0500
From: Justin Wilson <lists@mtin.net>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.1012151143000.5148@soloth.lewis.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

    Ay 10 Gig levels bandwidth should be much much cheaper than $30 /Mbit.
--=20
Justin Wilson <j2sw@mtin.net>
Aol & Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog =AD xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw =AD Follow me on Twitter
Wisp Consulting =AD Tower Climbing =AD Network Support




From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:46:13 -0500 (EST)
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style

On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Laurent GUERBY wrote:

> If a 10G port for transit is paid by comcast $30/Mbit/s monthly
> that's 0.19 cent/internet customer/month for a new 10G port
> to properly desaturate this particular link.
>
> Did I compute something wrong?

At that bandwidth level, isn't $30/mbit roughly an order of magnitude
higher than people are actually paying?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
  Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post