[133649] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Laurent GUERBY)
Wed Dec 15 05:44:53 2010
From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net>
To: Randy Epstein <nanog@hostleasing.net>
In-Reply-To: <00f401cb9c43$36c9ae40$a45d0ac0$@net>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:44:46 +0100
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, "'Rettke, Brian'" <Brian.Rettke@cableone.biz>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 05:31 -0500, Randy Epstein wrote:
> Laurent,
>
> >If a 10G port for transit is paid by comcast $30/Mbit/s monthly
> >that's 0.19 cent/internet customer/month for a new 10G port
> >to properly desaturate this particular link.
>
> >Did I compute something wrong?
>
> >Laurent
>
> Yes, now you need to multiply that by the numerous other ports that have the
> same conditions and need upgrades.
If I look at:
http://www.ams-ix.net/statistics/
That's 1.2 Tbit/s peak for European biggest IX so 120 10G ports
so about 22 cent/customer/month assuming Comcast alone generates this
kind of bandwidth and pays what mom & pop AS pay for transit.
It still doesn't compute to me...
Laurent
