[133642] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chaim Rieger)
Wed Dec 15 00:40:43 2010
In-Reply-To: <15DC968C-64A6-4485-9529-25003AD684BF@bsdboy.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:39:02 -0800
From: Chaim Rieger <chaim.rieger@gmail.com>
To: Wil Schultz <wschultz@bsdboy.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Wil Schultz <wschultz@bsdboy.com> wrote:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557
>
> This appears to be some serious FUD, but if true could have some serious implications for IPSEC stacks in all kinds of equipment.
>
> -wil
>
Does anyone remember the last time a law enforcement agency had
someone sign a 10 year NDA on a backdoor?
"Oh, times up, I can post it on Facebook now. Cool."
