[133637] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Net-Neutrality or Net-Neutered?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ken)
Tue Dec 14 23:51:12 2010
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:50:56 -0500
From: Ken <ken@sizone.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikwF+_H_c1hmVtYjqAEOmw8E6O2C4w6MWhsz31P@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:20:17PM -0600, Beavis said:
>I come across this interesting link.
>
>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4828&tag=nl.e036
>
>Is ICANN really that susceptible to govt. pressure?
Funny, tho - being succeptible to govt pressure CREATES an alt root DNS
structure. You'd think the smart thinkers in the govt woulda figured
that out. Apply pressure and it splinters. Sometimes easier to supervise
if its in one pile, no?
Also, "new DNS = whole new internet"? lol.
/kc
--
Ken Chase - ken@heavycomputing.ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA
Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front St. W.
