[133431] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Over a decade of DDOS--any progress yet?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thomas Mangin)
Thu Dec 9 12:06:14 2010
From: Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin@exa-networks.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <FF95A325-7231-453A-AD01-5FF279CC2D22@exa-networks.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:06:01 +0000
To: Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin@exa-networks.co.uk>
Cc: North American Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>> On Dec 8, 2010, at 10:10 PM, Thomas Mangin wrote:
>>=20
>>> Until this is sorted I believe flowspec will be a marginal solution.
>>=20
>> We're seeing a significant uptick in flowspec interest, actually, and =
S/RTBH has been around for ages.
>=20
> Great to hear :)
>=20
> But my point is still valid [...]
After some offline discussion with Pedro Marques, I now realise that I =
misunderstood the flow rule validation process, which mean that my =
"complain" is really irrelevant, which is good news as it mean that =
inter ISP flow route exchange really have no technical obstacle that I =
can now think off.
Thomas
