[133377] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Wed Dec 8 17:10:48 2010
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1012081951060.61421@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:08:43 +0100
To: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 8 dec 2010, at 20:10, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> Do you think adopting LISP or similar architectures to reduce =
the problems mentioned above?
Did the LISP guys solve failover after a locator goes away?
And what about the MTU issue? Do you lose initial packets when there is =
no mapping state yet?
(It's been a couple of years since I was current on the RRG stuff and =
LISP.)=
