[133352] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Wed Dec 8 14:43:37 2010
In-Reply-To: <04F8F711-098B-4886-B32C-97E05902C318@arbor.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:38:04 -0800
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins@arbor.net> wrote:
>
> On Dec 9, 2010, at 2:10 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>
>> Do you think adopting LISP or similar architectures to reduce the problems mentioned above?
>
> Yes.
>
No. I still fail to see the value of LISP in a mature and sane IPv6 world.
LISP may have value in a immature and insane IPv4 and IPv6 world.
Cameron
