[133346] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Dec 8 14:29:32 2010
To: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:10:46 +0100."
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1012081951060.61421@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:28:16 -0500
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1291836496_4921P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:10:46 +0100, Mohacsi Janos said:
> Do you think adopting LISP or similar architectures to reduce the
> problems mentioned above?
You're better off taking the mindset that it's time to stick a fork in IPv4,
it's done. Focus your attention on getting LISP or similar adopted for IPv6
before *that* routing table explodes.
--==_Exmh_1291836496_4921P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFM/9xQcC3lWbTT17ARAgtBAJ4haHMIqpBbW1IGyoxT3EuY3UiiQgCfcSdb
0thPaRZX1u2aVCcvuMh9/oY=
=6J2k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1291836496_4921P--
