|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Greg Whynott <Greg.Whynott@oicr.on.ca> To: Tom Daly <tom@dyn.com> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:37:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <451771740.671291753452499.JavaMail.tom@dhcp-252.public.mht.dyndns.com> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org > > Excuse me. Raised floor vs. overhead. ahh that makes much more sense, thanks Tom. > > I'm sure someone has an opinion=85 i suspect you are correct, not sure who would elect for the slower standar= d, considering they hit the streets fairly close to each other and I can't= see there being a huge difference in cost, but i could be wrong. (the isp = i'm connected to is running100G now) > >>> Optics: XFP vs. SFP+ >> Maybe you have no idea on what XFP or SFP+ is because you've been runnin= g a Gigabit based network and haven't made the jump to 10GE yet - i've more 10G ports than you can shake a stick at actually=85 my '?' was a= gain, people debate this? as the bit rates are verbatum, the major diffe= rence which one would choose the other over from my understanding was dista= nce to endpoint.. but again i could be wrong=85 wishing now i didn't send= anything. 8) -g -- This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged= information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or dist= ribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intende= d is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, pleas= e contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other = information contained in this message may not be that of the organization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |