[133245] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Dec 7 14:54:43 2010
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <599568926.521291749641213.JavaMail.tom@dhcp-252.public.mht.dyndns.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:49:49 -0800
To: Tom Daly <tom@dyn.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Dec 7, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Tom Daly wrote:
> Folks,
> I've been tempted by the NANOG PC into trying to run some "Lightning =
Debates" at NANOG 51 in Miami. The idea, similar to lighting talks, is a =
30 minute session, covering 3 debate topics, 10 minutes each. Each =
person would get 5 minutes to argue their side of the issue.
>=20
> Some ideas so far:
>=20
> UPS Systems: Battery vs. Flywheel
>=20
Which side will be represented by the folks from 365 Main?
> Cooling: Raised floor vs. Underfloor
>=20
What about overhead (which is the usual opposite to underfloor
which is the same as raised floor in most cases)
> Power: AC vs. DC
>=20
I think this is more context sensitive and that a one-size fits all =
argument
on either side wouldn't make much sense.
> Ethernet: 40GE vs. 100GE
>=20
ROFL
> Optics: XFP vs. SFP+
>=20
This is a debate topic? Really?
> Address Families: IPv4 vs. IPv6
>=20
Ooh... This one might be interesting.
Owen
