[133045] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Trying to Make Sense of the Comcast/Level 3 Dispute
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Fri Dec 3 13:43:53 2010
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiky1Q9+UFe3ig6p-ui467=t-xxi=AC=g4Mmi0GH@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:43:06 -0500
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Dec 3, 2010, at 1:34 PM, christian koch wrote:
> my guess is the info for that was pulled off comcast's route server, =
where
> only tata is seen
Asymmetric routing on the Internet? What will they think of next?!
That said, does changing the name of the middle network change the =
substance of the post?
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
P.S. And does Y! have a route-server to figure this stuff out? :)
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Matthew Petach =
<mpetach@netflight.com>wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> =
wrote:
>>> In a message written on Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 09:40:01PM -0800, Paul
>> Ferguson wrote:
>>>> Interesting article:
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>> =
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/sjs/trying-make-sense-comcast-level-=
3
>>>> - -dispute
>>>=20
>>> Here's an excellent summary, complete with some pictures:
>>>=20
>>>=20
>> =
http://www.voxel.net/blog/2010/12/peering-disputes-comcast-level-3-and-you=
>>>=20
>>> --
>>> Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
>>> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> Unfortunately, they got at least part of the diagram wrong;
>> Yahoo uses Global Crossing to reach Comcast, not TATA.
>>=20
>> Matt
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
