[132970] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: wikileaks unreachable
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jorge Amodio)
Fri Dec 3 01:37:08 2010
In-Reply-To: <1034C152-7A9B-44CE-8CC7-D984FFEE291C@ianai.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:36:58 -0600
From: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@gmail.com>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> But Jorge has a point. =A0If they wanted to help users get past their DNS=
problems, they could tweet for assistance, tweet their IP addy and ask to =
be re-tweeted, ask owners of authorities to set up wikileaks.$FOO.com to 'c=
rowd source' their name, etc.
I'll just point to an article I found very interesting about this matter:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101202/02243512089/how-response-to-wikil=
eaks-is-exactly-what-assange-wants.shtml
Aren't we being part of some kind of action-reaction game to produce
systematic changes as side effects ?
-J
