[13294] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg A. Woods)
Sat Nov 1 17:11:28 1997
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 17:08:13 -0500 (EST)
From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: bmanning@isi.edu's message
of "Sat, November 1, 1997 13:14:35 -0800"
regarding "Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful)"
id <199711012114.AA00695@zed.isi.edu>
Reply-To: woods@weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
[ On Sat, November 1, 1997 at 13:14:35 (-0800), bmanning@isi.edu wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful)
>
> Buying into NATs dooms people to live in thier private hells.
Yes, exactly. It might work for some people, for some applications, for
some period of time, but it's not the right solution for a long term
open Internet.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP <gwoods@acm.org> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>
