[132797] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: regional ASN's
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Hallgren)
Wed Dec 1 16:30:42 2010
From: Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr>
To: deleskie@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <1727880630-1291224719-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-154390616-@bda483.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:30:25 +0100
Cc: Ryan Finnesey <ryan.finnesey@HarrierInvestments.com>,
NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--=-XV12DE9algxIdDwylocZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Le mercredi 01 d=C3=A9cembre 2010 =C3=A0 17:31 +0000, deleskie@gmail.com a =
=C3=A9crit :
> You can use one AS and communities to seperate your traffic/policies.
Or other iBGP means of internal separation, like BGP confederations (in
order to avoid iBGP session hacks).
mh
>=20
> -jim
> ------Original Message------
> From: Ryan Finnesey
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: regional ASN's
> Sent: Dec 1, 2010 1:13 PM
>=20
> I see various people are recommending networks setup regional ASN's. I
> am in the process of setting up a new network which will serve as a
> transit network for all our operating units. I was planning on using
> one ASN for North America, Asia and Europe. Is this not recommended?
>=20
> Cheers
> Ryan
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
>=20
--=-XV12DE9algxIdDwylocZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAkz2vmwACgkQZNZ/rrgsqad5mQCeL4QEBeF6f/lDEVdXgFatfFmO
rl4An2EKSp5EIW0KbRm/x5+uA8xX+B5c
=xy05
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-XV12DE9algxIdDwylocZ--
