[132694] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: experience with equinix exchange
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Elmar K. Bins)
Tue Nov 30 07:37:09 2010
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:37:03 +0100
From: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi@4ever.de>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi@4ever.de>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <6968D82F-9E94-4884-9DAF-4FCB3364BD77@akcin.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--HzaOE8X7KzPzAQEl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Re,
mehmet@akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin) wrote:
> > But all the traffic on every Equinix and PAIX switch combined, is still=
lower than the traffic on any one of the three large exchanges in Europe. =
It really is all about the PNIs.
> I wonder how is NOTA like, do they ever make the traffic info public?
Not really, but that's probably typical.
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-58/content/presentations/Snowhorn-NO=
TA_Update.pdf
mentions 170+Gbps for NOTA, but that was 1.5 years ago.
Yours,
Elmar.
--=20
"Machen Sie sich erst einmal unbeliebt. Dann werden Sie auch ernstgenommen."
(Konrad Adenauer)
--------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]=
---
--HzaOE8X7KzPzAQEl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFM9O/ukss5pIab/AcRAizRAJwNqplgWClfkuk9ZmJrE+9XrVFxFgCdFXil
oObwClJjx/CXIpvADWD8B7c=
=krmd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--HzaOE8X7KzPzAQEl--
